MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388013836 · doi:10.1080/08880018.2023.2271974

Intractable abdominal pain as the sole symptom of Varicella Zoster reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: brief case report and review of the literature

2023· article· en· W4388013836 on OpenAlexaff
Yogi Chopra, Carly Hong, Tal Schechter, Muhammad Ali, Kuang‐Yueh Chiang, Donna A. Wall, Joerg Krueger

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Hematology and Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdominal painNeuralgiaDifferential diagnosisVaricella zoster virusChickenpoxSurgeryPresentation (obstetrics)TransplantationDermatologyNeuropathic painAnesthesiaVirusImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After primary infection, Varicella Zoster (VZV) persists in sensory dorsal root ganglia and may be reactivated in periods of diminished T-cell immunity. Varicella Zoster reactivation post allogenic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be challenging to diagnose as it does not always present with characteristic skin lesions. We describe a pediatric patient who presented with isolated severe abdominal pain with no other symptoms. Cutaneous lesions appeared only 10 days later resulting in delayed diagnosis and treatment. He was successfully treated with intravenous acyclovir and recovered after a prolonged hospital stay with post-herpetic neuralgia. Abdominal pain in children post HSCT has a broad differential and VZV reactivation should be considered even in absence of cutaneous lesions. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to reduce VZV-related morbidity and mortality. In this article we present a case report and review clinical presentation and outcome of similar cases in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Hematology and OncologySame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207