MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388017048 · doi:10.1021/acs.chas.3c00087

Lessons Learned: Spontaneous Detonation of 6-Azidotetrazolo[1,5-<i>b</i>]pyridazine

2023· article· en· W4388017048 on OpenAlexaff
James L. Gleason

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Chemical Health & Safety · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reactions and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyridazineDetonationHazardous wasteMaterials scienceChemistryExplosive materialMedicinal chemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistryWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a case study on the spontaneous detonation of 6-azidotetrazolo[1,5- b ]pyridazine, a compound that has been described as being stable despite having an N/C ratio of 2. We share the details of the incident and the lessons learned so that the potential hazards are reported for those who consider its use in the future. The compound was synthesized and handled five times without incident but then detonated upon standing. A one-pot technique to directly convert this hazardous material to the nonenergetic intermediate compound 6-hydroxytetrazolo[1,5- b ]pyridazine is also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Chemical Health & SafetySame topicChemical Reactions and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207