MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388017328 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3321379

Adaptive Exponential Fault Estimation for 1-D Linear Parabolic PDEs With Process Uncertainties

2023· article· en· W4388017328 on OpenAlexaff
Yuan Yuan, Xiaodong Xu, Chunhua Yang, Tingwen Huang, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Controllability of Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsExponential functionProcess (computing)Applied mathematicsMathematicsEstimationExponential growthComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of fault estimation is addressed for one-dimensional (1-D) linear boundary control and boundary observation (BCBO) parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs) with a faulty boundary measurement. The considered plant is subjected to simultaneous unknown multiplicative faults entering the boundary input and boundary measurement. Difficulties arise due to the coupling between the sensor fault parameter and unknown boundary state appearing in the measurement. With the only boundary input and faulty boundary measurement, it is rather challenging to estimate the accurate values of faults and state simultaneously. Therefore, most existing results only consider correct and healthy measurement for PDE systems. To this end, novel adaptation laws and an adaptive observer are designed in this work to provide exponential convergent joint fault-state estimation, where we design and leverage a set of novel filters. It is first time that unknown multiplicative fault parameter in the measurement can be estimated accurately in the PDE systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicStability and Controllability of Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207