MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388020453 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21762

The interrelationship between lower limb movement, muscle activity, and joint moment during half squat and gait

2023· article· en· W4388020453 on OpenAlexaff
Umi Matsumura, Toshiya Tsurusaki, Shimpei Yamamoto, Yeonghee Lee, Shinya Sunagawa, W. Darlene Reid, Hironobu Koseki

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnkleSquatPhysical medicine and rehabilitationBicepsKnee JointSagittal planeJoint (building)ElectromyographyGaitMoment (physics)Gait analysisMedicineAnatomyPhysical therapyPhysicsEngineeringSurgeryStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Joint moment is the resultant force of limb movements. However, estimation methods for joint moments using surface electromyography frequently use joint angles instead of limb angles. The limb angle in joint moment estimation using electromyography could clarify the effects of muscle activity on the limbs: acceleration, deceleration, or stabilization. No study has quantified the comprehensive relationship between limb movement, muscle activity, and joint moment. This study aimed to determine the influencing factors for ankle-joint moment and knee-joint moment in the sagittal plane among muscle activities and parameters related to limb movements during half squat and gait. This study included 29 healthy adults (16 female participants, 21.1 ± 2.09 years). Using inertial measurement units, thigh, shank, and foot inclination angles and angular accelerations were calculated as the parameters of limb movements. Muscle activations of the biceps femoris long head, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior were measured. Ankle joint moment and knee-joint moment were measured using a three-dimensional motion capture system and two force plates. Regression models showed high accuracy in measuring ankle-joint moment during a half squat and gait (R 2 f = 0.92, 0.97, respectively) and knee-joint moment during a half squat (R 2 f = 0.98), but not knee-joint moment during gait (R 2 f = 0.63). However, only a maximum of five parameters were selected from muscle activities and limb angular information. Tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius activity were the largest contributors to ankle-joint moment during a half squat and gait, respectively, while muscle activities were not directly reflected in the knee-joint moment during either movement. Consideration of the interrelationships among limb movement, muscle activity, and joint moment is required when adjusting joint movements according to the target and aim of the therapeutic interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207