MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388033944 · doi:10.1002/ejhf.3070

October 2023 at a Glance: From Prevention to Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment of Acute Decompensation and Comorbidities

2023· editorial· en· W4388033944 on OpenAlexaff
Daniela Tomasoni, Marianna Adamo, Marco Metra

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Heart Failure · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDecompensationIntensive care medicineHeart failureComorbidityInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PreventionPrevention of heart failure (HF) has a key role in our health care.1,2 Multivariable prediction models are frequently used to estimate the risk of incident HF.A systematic Bayesian meta-analysis, including 36 studies and 59 models for the prediction of HF, showed their predictive accuracy.However, 77% of model results were at high risk of bias, certainty of evidence was low, and no model had a clinical impact assessment.3 Monzo et al. 4 investigated the association of aldosterone concentrations with left ventricular (LV) remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients successfully treated by primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty for a first acute ST-elevation MI.LV volumes were measured within 4 days after acute MI using cardiac magnetic resonance and transthoracic echocardiography, 6 months later and, in a subset of cases, 3-9 years later.Aldosterone concentrations were associated with LV remodelling at 6 months, even in patients with an initial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) >40%, but not in the long term follow-up.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.583

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1740.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Heart FailureSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207