MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Printed Terahertz Spiral Zone Plate for Vortex Beam Generation

2023· article· en· W4388040374 on OpenAlexaff
Redwan Ahmad, L. Guiramand, Mariia Zhuldybina, X. Ropagnol, Ngoc Duc Trinh, Chloé Bois, F. Blanchard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationFabricationBeam (structure)OpticsSpiral (railway)Materials scienceGaussian beam3d printedZone plateOptoelectronicsVortexPhysicsEngineeringMechanical engineeringDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we fabricated and characterized printed terahertz (THz) spiral zone plates (THz-SZPs). Fabrication has been done using industrial roll-to-roll (R2R) continuous press with a flexography printing unit. From both simulation and experiment results it is seen that, printed spiral zone plates with topological charges, l=1,2, and 3, can convert the Gaussian THz beam into vortex THz beam accordingly with a focal length of 2.0 cm at the operating frequency of 0.36 THz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.398
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207