MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Power Optimization in RIS-Assisted P-NOMA for Full-Duplex 6G Vehicular Networks

2023· article· en· W4388040467 on OpenAlexaff
Somayeh Mokhtari, Fang Fang, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSingle antenna interference cancellationNomaSpectral efficiencyBandwidth (computing)Interference (communication)Transmitter power outputWirelessComputer networkTransmission (telecommunications)Power domainsData transmissionVisible light communicationRendering (computer graphics)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingChannel (broadcasting)Power (physics)TelecommunicationsTelecommunications linkEngineeringElectrical engineeringTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a new full-duplex transmission reconfigurable-intelligence-surface (RIS)-assisted vehicular communication framework aimed at enhancing vehicular communications among connected vehicles under congested urban areas. By integrating power-domain non-orthogonal multiple access (P-NOMA) and enabling spectrum reuse between the RIS-assisted vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, the proposed framework facilitates concurrent data transmission to multiple vehicles via a single sub-channel, effectively enhancing data rate performance without requiring additional bandwidth. To further improve the spectrum efficiency, we incorporate NOMA as a cross-tier interference coordination mechanism and employ successive interference cancellation (SIC) for mitigating interference originating from V2V communication, rendering our solution highly suitable for vehicular applications. We derive optimal values for transmit power and NOMA pair coefficients, and employ a successive convex approximation (SCA) technique to optimize RIS phase shifts. The superiority of the proposed approach is evaluated in comparison to the dominant interference scenario and orthogonal multiple access (OMA) technique with respect to the data rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207