Collaborative Deep Reinforcement Learning for Resource Optimization in Non-Terrestrial Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-terrestrial networks (NTNs) with low-earth orbit (LEO) satellites have been regarded as promising remedies to support global ubiquitous wireless services. Due to the rapid mobility of LEO satellite, inter-beam/satellite handovers happen frequently for a specific user equipment (UE). To tackle this issue, earth-fixed cell scenarios have been under studied, in which the LEO satellite adjusts its beam direction towards a fixed area within its dwell duration, to maintain stable transmission performance for the UE. Therefore, it is required that the LEO satellite performs real-time resource allocation, which however is unaffordable by the LEO satellite with limited computing capability. To address this issue, in this paper, we propose a two-time-scale collaborative deep reinforcement learning (DRL) scheme for beam management and resource allocation in NTNs, in which LEO satellite and UE with different control cycles update their decision-making policies through a sequential manner. Specifically, UE updates its policy subject to improving the value functions of both the agents. Furthermore, the LEO satellite only makes decisions through finite-step rollouts with a reference decision trajectory received from the UE. Simulation results show that the proposed scheme can effectively balance the throughput performance and computational complexity over traditional greedy-searching schemes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".