PC-SSL: Peer-Coordinated Sequential Split Learning for Intelligent Traffic Analysis in mmWave 5G Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifth Generation (5G) networks operating on mmWave frequency bands are anticipated to provide an ultrahigh capacity with low latency to serve mobile users requiring high-end cellular services and emerging metaverse applications. Managing and coordinating the high data rate and throughput among the mmWave 5G Base Stations (BSs) is a challenging task, and it requires intelligent network traffic analysis. While BSs coordination has been traditionally treated as a centralized task, this involves higher latency that may adversely impact the user’s Quality of Service (QoS). In this paper, we address this issue by considering the need for distributed coordination among BSs to maximize spectral efficiency and improve the data rate provided to their users via embedded AI. We present Peer-Coordinated Sequential Split Learning dubbed PC-SSL, which is a distributed learning approach whereby multiple 5G BSs collaborate to train and update deep learning models without disclosing their associated mobile users data, i.e., without privacy leakage. Our proposed PC-SSL minimizes the data transmitted between the client BSs and a server by processing data locally on the clients. This results in low latency and computation overhead in making handoff decisions and other networking operations. We evaluate the performance of our proposed PC-SSL in the mmWave 5G throughput prediction use-case based on a real dataset. The results demonstrate that our proposal outperforms conventional approaches and achieves a comparable performance to centralized, vanilla split learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".