Weak disturbance decoupling of high‐order fully actuated nonlinear systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary It is well known that all practical control systems are subject to external disturbances. Therefore, a feedback controller should be designed so that the closed‐loop system has some desired properties such as stability, good tracking performance, at the same time, the impact of external disturbances on the performance of the closed‐loop system is attenuated to some degree. On the other hand, almost all models for real fully actuated systems, which are derived based on the physical laws, are described by a set of high order differential equations. The traditional method for controlling these fully actuated systems is to convert the high order differential equations to first order differential equations, which are called the state equations, and then to design feedback controllers by using the state‐space design methods. Such conversion causes some inconveniences. To overcome such inconveniences, a high‐order fully actuated (HOFA) design method has been proposed to control HOFA systems. The main goal of this paper is to design a weak disturbance decoupling controller for HOFA nonlinear systems to guarantee the stability and desired output tracking performance of the closed‐loop system and to attenuate the impact of disturbances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it