MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

372 TAC-T cells persist and remain functional during and after repeated tumor exposure <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>

2023· article· en· W4388048115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Heather MacGregor, Suzanna L. Prosser, Stacey X. Xu, Kyle MacDonald, Aksha Kadri, Ritu R. Randhawa, Swati Shetty, Sailaja Pirati, Christopher W. Helsen, Sadhak Sengupta, Andreas G. Bader

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytotoxic T cellCancer researchIn vivoT cellAntigenFlow cytometryIn vitroTumor antigenBiologyImmune systemImmunotherapyMolecular biologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background T cell antigen coupler (TAC) is a chimeric receptor that redirects T cells (TAC-T) towards surface-expressed tumor antigens to create safe and durable anti-cancer immune responses. The TAC receptor activates T cells by co-opting the endogenous T cell receptor machinery via a CD3ε-specific binding motif and a cytoplasmic co-receptor tail. TAC01-HER2, a first-in-class TAC-T product targeting HER2 (ERBB2), has entered a phase I/II clinical trial. Here, we show that TAC-T cells retain their cytotoxicity capacity during and after repeated tumor challenges in vitro and in vivo. Methods The robustness of anti-tumor T cell responses were assessed in vitro in a recursive killing assay by repeatedly exposing HER2-specific TAC-T cells to HER2-expressing tumor cells for 11 successive rounds (39 days). T cells were characterized by flow cytometry to correlate T cell phenotypes with anti-tumor activity. In vivo, ongoing tumor control established by a single infusion of TAC-T cells was assessed in a tumor rechallenge experiment. MHC I/II-deficient NSG mice were engrafted subcutaneously with HER2+ tumor cells and rechallenged with the same tumor cell line 28 days later. TAC-T cells were isolated from mice at various time points for phenotypic and functional characterization. Results TAC-T products controlled tumor cell growth through 11 rounds of tumor cell challenge in vitro. Signs of reduced functionality were observed at round 11, which coincided with the emergence of a dysfunctional phenotype. During in vivo tumor rechallenge experiments, a single infusion of TAC-T cells led to complete clearance of the solid tumor xenograft and protected mice from a second tumor challenge 28 days after adoptive T cell transfer. TAC-T cells recovered from tumor sites at various time points exhibited phenotypic markers of activation, whereas TAC-T cells isolated from blood and spleen appeared to be antigen-experienced cells but lacked markers indicative of chronic activation and exhaustion. TAC-T cells isolated from spleens before and after the rechallenge were able to proliferate and kill tumor cells ex vivo. Conclusions Here we report evidence that TAC-T cells controlled tumor cell growth through 11 rounds of repeated tumor rechallenge in vitro, protected mice against tumor rechallenge, and demonstrated long-term ex vivo proliferative and cytotoxic capabilities. These data indicate long-lasting T cell persistence and functionality against solid tumors. Ethics Approval Animal studies performed for the work presented in this abstract were conducted under the Animal Utilization Protocol (AUP) # 20–10-37 and approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee at McMaster University (Hamilton, ON, Canada).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→