MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388048753 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.3c03745

Borophene Quantum Dots with Enhanced Nanozymatic Activity for the Detection of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and Cardiac Biomarkers

2023· article· en· W4388048753 on OpenAlexafffund
Syed Rahin Ahmed, Masoomeh Sherazee, Poushali Das, Jesse S. Dondapati, Seshasai Srinivasan, Amin Reza Rajabzadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDetection limitQuantum dotFluorescenceChemistryElectrochemistryNanotechnologyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)PhotochemistryMaterials scienceChromatographyElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum dots with unconventional properties can bring massive opportunities in multidirectional applications. Herein, borophene quantum dots (BQDs) have been synthesized that exhibit nanozymatic activity in addition to their conventional fluorescence emission nature and antibacterial activity. Fluorescence emission peak position and decay time were 450 nm and 2.8 ns, respectively. The average size of the BQDs was 5.2 nm. A significant 5-fold enhancement of the nanozymatic activity of BQDs was observed through an electrochemical process that enabled H 2 O 2 detection with an exceptional limit of detection (LOD) value of 3.5 nM. A mechanism study revealed that two factors, for example, radical scavenging and electroassisted oxidation of 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) have played significant roles in enhancing detection sensitivity and reducing detection time. BQDs possessed over 80% radical scavenging ability and, under an electrochemical field, demonstrated a 50-fold increase in the oxidation reaction of TMB compared with the conventional method. These remarkable findings were further utilized for the quantification of cholesterol and choline in a simulated blood sample with LOD values of 0.13 and 0.38 μM, respectively. The groundbreaking results presented in this study have the potential to open a pathway to move from the conventional nanozymatic detection method to an electroassisted one in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207