MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Narrative Review of Morquio Syndrome: Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) Type IV

2023· review· en· W4388049112 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew C.W. Robart, Abbey F. J. Alexander

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Ophthalmology Journal · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityUniversity of New BrunswickMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucopolysaccharidosisMedicineKeratan sulfateHunter syndromeEnzyme replacement therapyNarrative reviewPediatricsPathologyOphthalmologyInternal medicineGlycosaminoglycanDiseaseIntensive care medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Morquio Syndrome or Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IV (MPS IV) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder characterized by the deficiency of certain lysosomal enzymes involved in the breakdown of mucopolysaccharides. The deficiency results in proteoglycan accumulation, particularly keratan sulfate in various tissues in the body. Morquio Syndrome is classified into two subtypes: Morquio A and Morquio B, which are distinguished by the specific enzyme deficiency involved, with Morquio A being more prevalent. Morquio Syndrome commonly affects the eyes with 46.7% of diagnosed patients experiencing ocular symptoms related to the disorder. Objective: To perform a comprehensive review of the existing literature and summarize the ophthalmological manifestations of Morquio Syndrome. Methods: A methodical literature search was conducted, including papers with abstracts discussing ophthalmology or ocular pathology of “Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IV” or ” Morquio Syndrome.” Twelve relevant articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Seven of the articles consisted of case reports, collectively reporting on forty-one patients with Morquio Syndrome, primarily Morquio A. The outcome of the narrative review is an overview of the existing literature on ocular presentations of Morquio Syndrome and a summary of case report findings. Results: Forty-one different patients were identified from the included case reports, and forty patients were included as they presented with ocular pathology related to Morquio Syndrome. Corneal opacification was the most common presentation where twenty-seven patients had significant corneal opacification and seven patients had slight corneal opacification. Small, gray, spherical, dust-like opacities that dispersed among the stroma were most commonly seen in cases with corneal opacification. Other ocular presentations included decreased visual acuity, astigmatism, lens opacities, and glaucoma. Conclusion: Morquio syndrome, a rare genetic disorder, exhibits multiple ocular symptoms, with corneal opacification being the most common. While most research has concentrated on Morquio A, the more severe subtype, there's limited information on Morquio B, highlighting a need for more comparative studies. As the syndrome remains incurable, exploring new treatment avenues and understanding the reasons behind these ocular manifestations can significantly improve the quality of life for Morquio patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.200
GPT teacher head0.488
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Open Ophthalmology JournalSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207