MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388051345 · doi:10.1177/20543581231205340

Multidisciplinary Support To Access living donor Kidney Transplant (MuST AKT): A Clinical Research Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Living Kidney Donation

2023· article· en· W4388051345 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anne‐Marie Selzler, Parastoo Molla Davoodi, Scott Klarenbach, Ngan N. Lam, T. C. Smith, Natasha Wiebe, Bonnie Corradetti, S Ferdinand, Gordon S. Smith, Nancy Verdin, Aminu K. Bello, Kevin Wen, Soroush Shojai

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsGrey Nuns Community HospitalUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAlberta HealthAlberta Health Services
FundersAlberta InnovatesUniversity Hospital FoundationKidney Foundation of CanadaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPopulationPsychological interventionKidney transplantationTransplantationIntervention (counseling)ReferralFamily medicinePhysical therapyNursingSurgeryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the optimal treatment for eligible patients with kidney failure, although it is underutilized. Contextually tailored patient- and family-centered interventions may be effective to increase LDKT. Objective: We outline a protocol to test the feasibility of the Multidisciplinary Support To Access living donor Kidney Transplant (MuST AKT) intervention designed to increase LDKT. Design: Non-blinded single-center pilot randomized controlled trial with a qualitative interview component. Setting: Academic transplant referral center in Northern Alberta Region with a population of more than 2 million in its catchment area. Patients: English-speaking patients of the age range 18 to 75 years who are referred for kidney transplantation are eligible to participate. Measurements: Feasibility will be assessed by indicators of recruitment, retention, and completion rates, treatment fidelity, adherence to intervention, engagement in intervention, and acceptability. Methods: Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either standard care (control) or the experimental group who receive standard care plus the MuST AKT intervention, a person-centered program designed to assist and enable the kidney transplant candidate to achieve what is required to receive an LDKT. The intervention consists of an introductory session and 4 intervention sessions delivered in-person or virtually. Limitations: Inferences cannot be drawn regarding the efficacy/effectiveness of the MuST AKT intervention. This study is non-blinded. Conclusions: This pilot study is the first step in our broader initiative to increase LDKT in our health care jurisdiction. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of a future definitive randomized controlled trial. Trial registration number: NCT04666545.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Kidney Health and DiseaseSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207