Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract THE FIRST FACT about Olaf Cuaran is that his father, Sitric, was active in Ireland and Britain in the first quarter of the tenth century. This simple statement helps to explain Olaf’s career and the preoccupations of his descendants. Like his parent, Olaf ruled kingdoms in two islands, married princesses from among his enemies, and entered legend. The ancestry of Sitric and two other Vikings named Ragnall and Godfrey has been a matter of dispute. Irish writers describe Sitric, Ragnall, and Godfrey as the “descendants of lvar” (Uilmair) or the “kindred of Ivar” (clann lmair). Are these descriptions of family lineage, or are they a generic designation of Vikings whose ancestry is otherwise unknown? In the contemporary record in the Annals of Ulster the designation “descendant of Ivar” is used only during a period of forty-two years, from 896 to 937. This actually overstates matters a bit. Prior to 914 the phrase is used twice, in 896 for an Amlaim h[ua] lmair and in 904 for mar h[ua]lmair. From 914, and for the next twenty-four years, this identification is used for only four men: Sitric, Ragnall, Godfrey, and Godfrey’s son Olaf. Godfrey’s other sons are described as “sons of Godfrey.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".