Omental Artery Bleeding: A Rare Complication of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) is often performed to treat acute cholecystitis in critically ill or high-risk surgical patients. This case report illuminates a rare complication following PCC that has not been previously reported in the literature. Case Presentation: A 49-year-old male with a complex medical history presented with symptoms indicative of cholecystitis which was confirmed on imaging. The patient underwent PCC with no intra-procedural complications. Post-procedure, the patient experienced a significant drop in vital signs with intraperitoneal free fluid on CT. Prompt fluoroscopy-guided angiography that identified bleeding from an omental artery, along with subsequent embolization of the bleeding artery were crucial in stabilizing the patient's condition. Conclusion: This case report underscores the importance of comprehensive anatomical understanding, procedural vigilance, and swift response to complications during PCC. The uniqueness of this case lies in the rarity of the complication and the successful management, thereby enriching the existing compendium of knowledge on PCC-associated risks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it