Navigating the New Normal: The Impact of COVID-19 on China's Tourism Industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to quantify the transformation of China's tourism market during the pandemic.The research relies on methodological concepts developed by WHO, UN, and UNWTO.The methods include a strategic approach based on the analysis of key tourism market indicators and economic data, including information about global tourism.The study analyzed the tourism sector and highlighted pathways for restructuring the market and promoting safe tourism in the spread of and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.According to the results of the study, statistics about the number of registered disease cases by country provide a certain level of awareness about tourism safety in a country.Tourism within China has acquired strategic importance, reorienting towards domestic tourism development.This sector has become a key component of the local economy.The Chinese tourism market, having become one of the largest in the world, has gained popularity among the countries of the Asia-Pacific region for both inbound and outbound tourists.This issue is especially important for identifying the impact of crisis events on the economy and the strategies aimed at overcoming the crisis.The finding of the study can be used by local governments and tourism organizations to develop tactical measures for the provision of safe tourism services in their area, as well as step-by-step instruction for crisis management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".