Integrative chromatin state annotation of 234 human ENCODE4 cell types using Segway reveals disease drivers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Towards the goal of identifying functional elements in the human genome, the fourth and final phase of the ENCODE consortium has newly profiled hundreds of human tissues using sequencing-based measurements of genomic activity such as ChIP-seq measures of transcription factor binding and histone modification. Chromatin state annotations created by segmentation and genome annotation (SAGA) methods such as Segway have emerged as the predominant integrative summary of such epigenomic data sets. Here, we present the ENCODE4 catalog of Segway annotations, a set of sample-specific genome-wide Segway chromatin state annotations for 234 ENCODE human biosamples inferred from 1,794 functional genomics experiments. We define an updated vocabulary of chromatin state terms that includes patterns of activity present only in a subset of samples or identified only with rarely-performed assays. We show that these ENCODE4 Segway annotations accurately capture both general and cell-type-specific regulatory patterns, and do so with substantially improved sensitivity relative to prior large-scale chromatin annotation sets. This catalog facilitates the downstream discovery of regulatory mechanisms which underlie diseases and traits identified by genome-wide association studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".