Digital Twin Model Selection for Feature Accuracy in Wireless Edge Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Digital twins (DTs) are virtual implementations of real physical systems (PSs) that interact with other objects on their behalf. Each PS periodically communicates with its digital twin so that the state of the DT is always sufficiently current. Using these updates, a DT can provide features that represent the real behavior of its PS using models that yield differing levels of system accuracy. In this paper, we study the DT model selection problem in wireless networks where the DTs of multiple PSs are hosted at an edge server (ES). The accuracy obtained from a given model is a function of its required amount of PS input data, the updating frequency, and the amount of computational capacity needed at the ES. The objective is to maximize the minimum achieved accuracy among the requested features by making appropriate model selections subject to wireless channel and ES resource availability. The problem is first formulated as an NP-complete integer program. The paper then uses relaxation and dependent rounding, and introduces a polynomial time approximation algorithm to obtain good solutions. A variety of simulation results are presented that demonstrate the excellent performance of the proposed solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".