MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388084449 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.181017

Green Financing as a Bridge Between Green Banking Strategies and Environmental Performance in Punjab, India

2023· article· en· W4388084449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Neha Bansal, Sanjay Taneja, Ercan Özen

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)BusinessFinanceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Green banking (GB), which aligns financial practices with environmental sustainability, is becoming increasingly important in solving modern global concerns such as climate change and resource conservation.This research examines the notion of GB and its significant consequences for the environmental performance of the banking sector in Punjab (India).The unique economic and environmental characteristics of Punjab makes it an essential area for investigating the implementation of GB strategies.The research focuses on the intricate relationship between operations-related GB strategies and a bank's environmental performance, particularly emphasizing the mediation of banks' green financing.Data for this study was meticulously gathered from public and private sector bank employees, comprising 290 participants.Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method was utilised for the analysis and the findings demonstrate a statistically significant and positive relationship among the variables indicated above.Furthermore, the research reveals that green finance partially mediates this relationship.These results have far-reaching implications for the banking sector's various stakeholders.This research can help regulatory authorities and policymakers in the conceptualization of laws and regulations that encourage green banking adoption.Banking institutions, in turn, may use this knowledge to improve their strategies and operations, improving environmental performance while preserving financial stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessFrench-language works237,207