MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ambient IoT: Transmit Power Minimization for NOMA-Enabled BackCom

2023· article· en· W4388086084 on OpenAlexaff
Diluka Galappaththige, Fatemeh Rezaei, Chintha Tellambura, Amine Maaref

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNomaComputer scienceMinificationInternet of ThingsPower (physics)Transmitter power outputWirelessComputer networkTelecommunicationsEmbedded systemTelecommunications linkTransmitterPhysicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ambient internet-of-things networks are just emerging to support sixth-generation wireless goals. We thus investigate a symbiotic radio (SR) system for a single-user primary network and a backscatter communication network that supports non-orthogonal multiple access. The primary base station (BS) concurrently supports the primary user and multiple tags, which modulate and reflect their data using the primary BS signal. The user decodes its data and the tags’ data using the successive interference cancellation technique. We propose a novel optimization framework to accommodate the requirements of both the primary user and the tags while also improving SR network performance. By constructing the beamforming vectors to support both primary and backscatter networks, we develop a BS transmit power minimization problem. The problem formulation ensures the various quality-of-service demands of the user and the tags and the tag energy harvesting requirements. Because of the non-convexity of the problem, we employ semi-definite relaxation techniques to obtain a sub-optimal solution. We evaluate the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm. Finally, we present extensive numerical results and simulations that establish the validity and performance gains of the proposed optimization scheme without modifying the fundamental passive tag architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207