Research on Relevant Issues Regarding the Creditor’s Right of Revocation in the Chinese Civil Code
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The creditor’s right of revocation is an important aspect of the debt preservation system. Regarding the legal effects of and approaches to realizing this right, there are various interpretations in the theoretical realm and inconsistencies in judicial practice. From a legal effects perspective, the creditor’s right of revocation in nature is not solely a right of formation, but also contains elements of a right of claim. In an action for the creditor’s revocation right, the creditor can simultaneously request the counterparty to assume the civil liability to the debtor as a result of the revocation of the act, such as returning property, providing compensation, or fulfilling overdue debts. In terms of the approaches to realizing the right, the creditors can directly apply for compulsory enforcement based on an effective judgment arising from their litigation or revocation litigation with the debtors to realize their rights against the debtors. Generally, there is no need for a combined exercise of the right of revocation with the subrogation right. However, in special circumstances, allowing the two rights to be exercised together can strengthen the protection for the creditors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".