Active and passive mechanical characterization of a human descending thoracic aorta with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A human aorta from a female donor affected by Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome was retrieved during a surgery for organ donation for transplant. The aorta was preserved in refrigerated Belzer UW organ preservation solution and tested within a few hours for mechanical characterization with and without vascular smooth muscle activation. KCl and Noradrenaline were used as vasoactive agents in bubbled Krebs-Henseleit buffer solution at 37 °C. A quasi-static and a dynamic mechanical characterization of the full wall and the three individual layers were carried out for strips taken in longitudinal and circumferential directions. The full wall in the descending portion of the aorta underwent mechanical tests with and without smooth muscle activation. Results were compared to data obtained from healthy aortas and show a reduced stiffness of the full wall in circumferential direction. Also, a significant reduction of the response to vasoactive agents in circumferential direction was observed, while the longitudinal response was similar to healthy cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".