MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388101184 · doi:10.1109/taes.2023.3328580

Unlocking Conformal Microwave Split Ring Resonant Sensors for In-Flight Ice Sensing

2023· article· en· W4388101184 on OpenAlexafffund
Aaryaman Shah, Omid Niksan, Fatemeh Niknahad, Mandeep Chhajer Jain, Dan Fuleki, Faezeh Rasimarzabadi, Mohammad H. Zarifi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMicrowaveConformal mapRemote sensingAcousticsAerospace engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsGeologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-flight ice accretion is an ongoing challenge for airplane safety as it disrupts the aerodynamics of wings, increasing drag and decreasing lift. This work proposes a conformal ice sensing method based on microwave split-ring resonator (SRR) sensors for early ice detection on critical aircraft surfaces. A single-port dual-frequency sensor with SRRs operating at ∼1.95 and ∼2.13 GHz was implemented and integrated on a NACA 0018 airfoil with a chord of 0.25 m. The sensor's performance was experimentally investigated in ice crystal icing (ICI) conditions at the National Research Council's (NRC) Research Altitude Test Facility (RATFac), at a simulated altitude of 19 000 ft, a velocity of 100 m/s and, a total air temperature of +3˚C. The performance of the sensor was evaluated with the resonant frequency parameter to extract correlations in different icing conditions. The sensor was tested in different melt ratio conditions (11%, 13%, 16%, and 25%) at varying accretion time periods, accurately determining the onset of icing, the increase in accretion volume, and its eventual shedding, while successfully differentiating the %melt conditions tested. Additionally, the sensor's response to electrothermal deicing procedures is presented, demonstrating its capability for monitoring the efficiency of deicing procedures and sensing the formation of ice during anti-icing operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207