UPRAVLJANJE TROŠKOVIMA POSLOVANJA U PROCESU DIGITALNE TRANSFORMACIJE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Potreba za stalnim upravljanjem troškovima javlja se kao odgovor organizacije da opstane u nadolazećem procesu globalizacije. Upravljati troškovima i pri tome obezbjediti kontinuiran kvalitet poslovanja, svakako predstavlja jedan od najvećih izazova. Proces digitalne transformacije u tom pogledu donosi značajan iskorak, jer pruža organizacijama poslovne mogućnosti koje ranije nisu mogle ni zamisliti. Ovaj rad ima svrhu da ukaže na potencijal digitalnih tehnologija koje, kroz nove poslovne modele, mogu značajno uticati na troškove sa jedne strane, a sa druge strane na nivo kvaliteta poslovanja, te satisfakciju zaposlenih i korisnika. Budući da tržište BiH postaje dio globalnog tržišta, a kompanije u BiH moraju da uhvate korak sa procesom digitalne transformacije za kojim već uveliko zaostaju, ovo pitanje postaje sve važnije u njihovom svakodnevnom upravljanju.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".