Investigating the role of e-commerce application and digital marketing implementation on the financial and sustainability performance: An empirical study on Indonesian SMEs ,
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper examined the influence of digital marketing and e-commerce on marketing performance and sustainability of the small and medium enterprises (SMEs). This research is quantitative research using a questionnaire approach method. Quantitative research is a research method based on the philosophy of positivism, used to research certain populations or samples, collecting data using research instruments, quantitative or statistical data analysis, with the aim of testing predetermined hypotheses. The sampling technique in this research is non-probability sampling. The respondents of this research were 580 SME owners in Indonesia. Research data was obtained by distributing online questionnaires via social media. The questionnaire was designed using a Likert scale from 1 to 7 and the analysis of research data used structural equation modeling (SEM). Based on the research results, it is concluded that digital marketing had a positive and significant relationship to marketing performance, E-Commerce had a positive and significant relationship with marketing performance, Digital marketing had a positive and significant relationship with business sustainability. In SMEs, E-Commerce had a positive and significant relationship with business sustainability in SMEs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it