Investigation the effect of digital taxation and digital accounting on customs efficiency and port sustainability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper Exploration effect of digital taxation and digital accounting on customs efficiency and corporate sustainability at customs ports. Traditional tax and accounting procedures have undergone a radical transformation thanks to digital technology, which also provides more efficient methods that can have a big influence on customs operations. This article tries to clarify the interconnectivity between digital taxes, digital accounting, and the customs environment by a detailed analysis of customs-related factors such as compliance, efficiency, and sustainability. By automating compliance checks and streamlining tax-related activities, digital taxation is shown to considerably improve customs efficiency and efficiently comply with sustainability goals. Digital accounting simultaneously increases data accuracy and process efficiency, enhancing the sustainability of customs ports and significantly enhancing customs efficiency. The results of this study have significance for both customs agencies and businesses, offering the possibility of improving operational effectiveness, compliance observance, and sustainability practices. However, the necessity for continual research that concentrates on cutting-edge technology and legal frameworks is highlighted by several restrictions. By offering actual proof of the beneficial effects of digital technology on customs operations and sustainability, this study adds to the body of knowledge and lays the groundwork for further in-depth investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".