A network-based methodology to reconstruct biodiversity based on interactions with indicator species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The relationship between species presence, biodiversity reconstruction, and latitudinal gradients is a complex and multifaceted topic that has been the subject of extensive research in ecology. Recent studies have provided valuable insights into the patterns and drivers of these phenomena. Also, with the ongoing decline in biodiversity, there is a need for efficient field monitoring techniques. Indicator species (IS) emerged as a promising tool to monitor diversity because their presence indicates a maximum number of conditionally co-occurring species. We aim to assess the effectiveness of IS for biodiversity reconstruction implicitly based on their co-occurrence with other species through a network-based methodology. The IS are identified based on various network metrics and the likelihood of species’ occurrences is computed based on (1) their conditional occurrence probability with IS and (2) the occurrence probability of IS. We test the approach with field observations of birds in the Côte-Nord region of Québec. From our methodology, the climate latitudinal gradient plays a significant role on the alternation in composition of IS with an almost complete turnover between northern and southern networks. The latitudinal gradient impacts also the nature of the inter-specific interactions with more avoidance relationship toward the Tropics and more cooperation liaisons toward the north. Regarding the effectiveness in the reconstruction of assemblages occurrence, we observe a strong negative correlation ( r ≤ − 0.95) between the percentage of sites occupied and the dissimilarity between the original and the estimated occurrences. More precisely, species must be present in more than 29% and 33% of northern and southern sites to recover well from its co-occurrence with IS. Therefore, it is more challenging to reconstruct biodiversity in communities closet to Tropics due to higher complex interactions and interspecific competition in these areas, which make it more difficult to infer community composition. In conclusion, our method demonstrates that it is possible to predict local species assemblages based on their implicit interactions with local IS. Nevertheless, the relatively low success of less present species illustrates the need for further theoretical development to reconstruct biodiversity, mainly to recover the occurrence of rare species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".