MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cooling Fan Failure Modes to Enable Development of Automotive ECU Fan Health Monitoring System

2023· article· en· W4388115851 on OpenAlex
H. Mohseni Sadjadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverheating (electricity)Automotive engineeringAutomotive industryTurbofanEngineeringFailure mode and effects analysisElectronic control unitFan-inCatastrophic failureFault detection and isolationAirflowPreventive maintenanceReliability engineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringActuator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic control units (ECUs) are widely used in the automotive industry. Recent efforts to enable enhanced and automated driving requires these ECUs to process and execute computationally expensive algorithms. With these developments, the ECUs now have a higher computing power and thus are at a greater risk of overheating. This may limit the availability of the essential functionalities in the vehicle. Currently, high operating temperatures are mitigated using passive cooling, which allows heat to dissipate without expelling any energy; however, more robust methods are required to enable this new technology. A cooling fan system is one of the desired methods for ECU thermal management, as this type of system draws cooler air from outside and expels the warm air from within. Therefore, the fan health status is critical to ensure ECU availability and reliability for vehicle operation, as when the fans become degraded, they cannot maintain the required airflow to minimize the ECU operating temperature. Traditionally, fan failures are detected by monitoring the fan speed versus the commanded duty cycle, thus it is desired to develop a robust health monitoring method for the fans. Fan failure mode study and fault injection can be used to enable the development of prognostics. Investigating the fan failure modes results in two main categories, which are internal and external. External fan failures include degradation and cracking of the outer casing, while internal failures include motor and ball bearing issues. Fault injection methods were developed based on these failure modes while considering potential operating conditions. For example, the fans were exposed to multiple environmental conditions, such as dust, humidity, and heat. These conditions can potentially trigger both internal and external failures. The data collection was conducted with the fans running in a standalone setup, being controlled by external equipment to ensure that the electronic input values were known. After running tests for 30 days, sufficient data was collected to enable degradation modelling. The data will contribute to the development of a predictive algorithm which will estimate the state of health of the fan based on its performance over time. This paper will discuss the failure modes and the data generated through simulation and fault injection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it