MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388116470 · doi:10.1159/000534346

Paracentral Acute Middle Maculopathy in Migraines with Aura

2023· article· en· W4388116470 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Milad, Fares Antaki, Andrew Farah, Karim Hammamji, Marc Saab

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Reports in Ophthalmology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Optic Conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalHôpital Charles-Le MoyneMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMaculopathyAuraMigraineOphthalmologyRetinalVisual acuityRetinaFundus (uterus)RetinopathyAnesthesiaNeuroscienceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) has recently been described following episodes of migraine. In this report, we present a case of PAMM and describe the role of en face optical coherence tomography (OCT). A 75-year-old woman presented with subjective vision loss over a 2-week period in the right eye. She was known for migraines with aura that presented with progressive spreading of positive and negative visual phenomena which usually resolved in under an hour. Her recent migraine episode was "atypical," as it lasted 3 days. She also experienced a monocular central scotoma with "black spots and jagged, zig-zag edges." The positive auras resolved spontaneously, whereas the central scotoma persisted. Spectral domain OCT showed an area of perifoveal hyperreflectivity from the inner plexiform to the outer plexiform layers consistent with PAMM. The mid-retina en face OCT and OCT angiography demonstrated an ovoid focal patch of hyperreflectivity with flow interruption, characteristic of globular PAMM. We diagnosed her with migraines with aura and presumed retinal vasospasm, complicated by retinal ischemia in the form of globular PAMM. Acute retinal ischemia, which may require urgent neurovascular workup and giant cell arteritis evaluation, must be considered in patients with migraines alongside persistent visual changes. Diagnosing PAMM requires a high level of suspicion since it can present without significant changes in visual acuity, visual fields, and fundus photographs. With the inclusion of en face OCT in the clinicians' diagnostic armamentarium, the slightest signs of retinal ischemic changes, such as PAMM, become evident.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Reports in OphthalmologySame topicRetinal and Optic ConditionsFrench-language works237,207