Federated Learning for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection Using Vision Transformers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common consequence of diabetes mellitus called diabetic retinopathy (DR) results in lesions on the retina that impair vision. It can cause blindness if not detected in time. Unfortunately, DR cannot be reversed, and treatment simply keeps eyesight intact. The risk of vision loss can be considerably decreased with early detection and treatment of DR. Ophtalmologists must manually diagnose DR retinal fundus images, which takes time, effort, and is cost-consuming. It is also more prone to error than computer-aided diagnosis methods. Deep learning has recently become one of the methods used most frequently to improve performance in a variety of fields, including medical image analysis and classification. In this paper, we develop a federated learning approach to detect diabetic retinopathy using four distributed institutions in order to build a robust model. Our federated learning approach is based on Vision Transformer architecture to classify DR and Normal cases. Several performance measures were used such as accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. The results show an improvement of up to 3% in terms of accuracy with the proposed federated learning technique. The technique also resolving crucial issues like data security, data access rights, and data protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".