Federated Learning for Diabetic Retinopathy Detection Using Vision Transformers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common consequence of diabetes mellitus called diabetic retinopathy (DR) results in lesions on the retina that impair vision. It can cause blindness if not detected in time. Unfortunately, DR cannot be reversed, and treatment simply keeps eyesight intact. The risk of vision loss can be considerably decreased with early detection and treatment of DR. Ophtalmologists must manually diagnose DR retinal fundus images, which takes time, effort, and is cost-consuming. It is also more prone to error than computer-aided diagnosis methods. Deep learning has recently become one of the methods used most frequently to improve performance in a variety of fields, including medical image analysis and classification. In this paper, we develop a federated learning approach to detect diabetic retinopathy using four distributed institutions in order to build a robust model. Our federated learning approach is based on Vision Transformer architecture to classify DR and Normal cases. Several performance measures were used such as accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. The results show an improvement of up to 3% in terms of accuracy with the proposed federated learning technique. The technique also resolving crucial issues like data security, data access rights, and data protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it