LOBECTOMIA POR NEOPLASIA PULMONAR EM CÃES E GATOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As neoplasias pulmonares em cães e gatos podem ser de origem primária ou metastática. A média de idade dos animais afetados é de 10 anos, sendo reportada uma maior incidência nas raças Labrador Retriever, Springer Spaniel Inglês, Boxer, Doberman Pinscher, Pastor Australiano, Setter Irlandês e Bernese Mountain Dog. Adenocarcinoma é o tipo histológico mais comum observado nos cães e gatos, o carcinoma de células escamosas e carcinomas anaplásicos são menos comuns. Tosse crônica não responsiva a antibióticos é o mais frequentemente observado, Intolerância ao exercício, taquipneia, dispneia e claudicação podem ocorrer. O diagnóstico é baseado na apresentação clínica, histórico, achados no exame físico e exames de imagem como a radiografia e tomografia computadorizada de tórax. O tratamento é realizado pela ressecção cirúrgica do lobo afetado, e pode ser associada a quimioterapia com profissional especializado. O prognóstico é reservado, pois depende de diversos fatores para do tempo de sobrevida do paciente.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".