MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388129799 · doi:10.1002/prot.26627

Biophysical and biochemical characterization of the thioredoxin system from <i>Colwellia psychrerythraea</i>

2023· article· en· W4388129799 on OpenAlexafffund
Naheda Sahtout, D.A.R. Sanders

Bibliographic record

VenueProteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThioredoxinThioredoxin reductaseFerredoxin-thioredoxin reductaseEscherichia coliBiochemistryBiologyReductaseCofactorPsychrophileEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thioredoxin system is a ubiquitous oxidoreductase system consisting of the enzyme thioredoxin reductase, the protein thioredoxin, and the cofactor nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate. The system has been comprehensively studied from many organisms, such as Escherichia coli; however, structural and functional analysis of this system from psychrophilic bacteria has not been as extensive. In this study, the thioredoxin system proteins of a psychrophilic bacterium, Colwellia psychrerythraea, were characterized using biophysical and biochemical techniques. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of the C. psychrerythraea thioredoxin system suggested the presence of a putative thioredoxin reductase and at least three thioredoxin. In this study, these identified putative thioredoxin system components were cloned, overexpressed, purified, and characterized. Our studies have indicated that the thioredoxin system proteins from E. coli were more stable than those from C. psychrerythraea. Consistent with these results, kinetic assays indicated that the thioredoxin reductase from E. coli had a higher optimal temperature than that from C. psychrerythraea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsSame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207