THE ANTI-IMPERIAL GENRE PARADIGM OF THE CANADIAN POST-VICTORIAN NOVEL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper offers a comprehensive analysis of discursive anti-imperial models in Canadian post-Victorian novels. The set tasks relate to detailing the features of this genre paradigm. In particular, attention is focused on the study of its historical, literary, and cultural context. The explanation of the socio-historical background typical of classical English Victorianism, provided in the paper, helps to trace the evolution of the related genre on Canadian soil. Its reinterpretation was prompted by the polyethnic and cultural ‘mosaic’ of the country, which became a prerequisite for the emergence of original models in modern sociology, cultural studies, and fiction. The study postulates the idea of an anti-imperial paradigm of the genre within the Dominion of Canada. Hence, the process of transforming the discourse of the Victorian novel into the post-Victorian one is demonstrated to be determined by the peculiarities of the post-colonial multicultural structure of the country, which manifests itself at the thematic, cognitive, psychological, and poetic levels. For the purpose of comprehensive analysis, the research is based on the plurality of historical and philosophical foundations within the field of ethics. The range of methods encompasses syncretic, cultural-historical, psychoanalytic, ‘close reading’, genetic, and gynocriticism. The study led to the observation that the social pattern of the Victorian era (a strict religious and moral code, the pretext of which was Protestantism, mysticism, etc.) permeated Canadian prose as an echo of English Victorianism. There was an ontological dialogue between the Victorian era and post-Victorianism, between individuals and the times in which they lived. The relationship between literature and individuals of different cultural and historical periods had an evolutionary character. The evolution of the genre of the Canadian post-Victorian novel, particularly in the works by L. M. Montgomery, B. Moore, and M. Atwood, is related to the multifaceted style, which involves the use of diverse elements from various aesthetic forms. This synthesis is the result of an experiment with both new and traditional literary models in Canadian literature. The correlation between the classical and post-Victorian genres shows the functionality of such means as satire, pastiche, and simulacrum in the latter. These tools transform the Victorian novel into an ‘anti-Victorian’ one. The examination of the modern version of the classical genre demonstrates the heterogeneity of meanings, their layering and transmission, a new role and conceptual load, motivated by purely national means of explanation. Over the course of an extended journey through time, the traditional Victorian models, adopted in the literature of the metropolis, had been transformed on Canadian soil. They acquired unique qualities, expanding the field of event and poetic content of the works by Canadian authors and demonstrating their solid post-Victorian anti-imperial discourse.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".