MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388138523 · doi:10.1002/andp.202300326

A Proposal for a Low‐Frequency Axion Search in the 1–2 μ$\umu$ eV Range and Below with the BabyIAXO Magnet

2023· article· en· W4388138523 on OpenAlexaff
Saiyd Ahyoune, Alejandro Álvarez Melcón, S. Arguedas Cuendis, S. Calatroni, C. Cogollos, J. A. Devlin, Alejandro Díaz‐Morcillo, D. Díez-Ibáñez, Babette Döbrich, Javier Galindo, J. D. Gallego, J. M. García-Barceló, B. Gimeno, J. Golm, Yikun Gu, Louis Herwig, I.G. Irastorza, Antonio José Lozano Guerrero, C. Malbrunot, Jordi Miralda‐Escudé, Juan Monzó‐Cabrera, Jose R. Navarro-Madrid, Javier Redondo, José Reina‐Valero, K. Schmieden, Tim Schneemann, M. Siodlaczek, S. Ulmer, Walter Wuensch

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnalen der Physik · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersEuropean Social FundH2020 European Research CouncilAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónEuropean Research CouncilEuropean Regional Development FundMax-Planck-GesellschaftEuropean CommissionRoyal SocietyCERN
KeywordsAxionMagnetCryostatPhotonPhysicsRange (aeronautics)SIGNAL (programming language)Sensitivity (control systems)Electronic circuitCoupling (piping)OpticsParticle physicsDark matterComputer scienceSuperconductivityAerospace engineeringMaterials scienceElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In the near future BabyIAXO will be the most powerful axion helioscope, relying on a custom‐made magnet of two bores of 70 cm diameter and 10 m long, with a total available magnetic volume of more than 7 m 3 . In this document, it proposes and describe the implementation of low‐frequency axion haloscope setups suitable for operation inside the BabyIAXO magnet. The RADES proposal has a potential sensitivity to the axion‐photon coupling down to values corresponding to the KSVZ model, in the (currently unexplored) mass range between 1 and 2 eV, after a total effective exposure of 440 days. This mass range is covered by the use of four differently dimensioned 5‐meter‐long cavities, equipped with a tuning mechanism based on inner turning plates. A setup like the one proposed will also allow an exploration of the same mass range for hidden photons coupled to photons. An additional complementary apparatus is proposed using LC circuits and exploring the low energy range ( eV). The setup includes a cryostat and cooling system to cool down the BabyIAXO bore down to about 5 K, as well as an appropriate low‐noise signal amplification and detection chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnalen der PhysikSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207