50th Year of Publication: Honoring the Duncan A. Gordon Award Winners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2014, The Journal introduced the Duncan A. Gordon Award in honor of our longtime editor, the late Dr. Duncan Gordon. In 1979, Duncan, previously an associate editor and the acting Editor-in-Chief, became the Editor-in-Chief. He remained in this role for 32 years until 2011. The award recognizes the most highly influential research article published in a given year, as determined by the editorial committee. When deciding on the Duncan A. Gordon Award recipient, the committee takes into account the number of citations an article has received over the preceding 2 calendar years. Importantly, the committee also considers the potential of the article to advance treatment and/or alter clinical practice based on its impact and originality. The award is typically presented at The Journal ’s reception at the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) annual meeting. During the coronavirus … Address correspondence to Dr. E.D. Silverman, Editor-in-Chief, The Journal of Rheumatology, 365 Bloor Street East, Suite 901, Toronto, ON M4W 3L4, Canada. Email: esilverman{at}jrheum.com.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".