MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MORPHOANATOMICAL RESPONSES OF CLONAL COCOA GENOTYPES TO SOIL FLOODING

2023· article· en· W4388141265 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Foco · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to water stress
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
FundersUniversidade Estadual de Santa Cruz
KeywordsCuttingLenticelBiologyAerenchymaGenotypeclone (Java method)HorticultureFlooding (psychology)StarchBotanyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of soil flooding on the anatomy of seven T. cacao clones (CP-49, CCN-10, PH-16, CP-06, CEPEC-2007, CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319), obtained by rooting medium of stem cuttings, aiming to elucidate the possible mechanisms of tolerance to anoxia, to subsidize the cultivation of these clones in hydromorphic soils or with drainage problems. The experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions at UESC, Ilhéus, BA. The plants were submitted to two water regimes (with and without flooding) for a period of 45 days. The formation of lenticels at the base of the stem, at eight days of flooding, was a striking feature in the survival process of clonal genotypes. The clones from the flooded treatment showed more starch in relation to the control treatment. There was an enlargement of the intercellular spaces in the different organs of most of the plants of the evaluated clonal genotypes. Aerenchyma formation was noted in clones CP-49, CCN-10, PH-16, CP-06 and PS-1319. The non-flooded CP-49 clone presented a higher amount of phenolic compounds, while in the other clonal genotypes these compounds were present in greater amounts in the flooded treatment. The development of a greater amount of adventitious roots in the plants of clones CP-49 and CCN-10 demonstrated greater morphoanatomical plasticity of these clones in relation to the others, which had these alterations less pronounced and were more sensitive to substrate flooding. The plants of the clonal genotypes CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319 showed lower foliar plasticity in response to soil flooding, in relation to the other clones evaluated. Clones CCN-10 and CP-49 were the most tolerant to soil flooding, while clones CP-06 and CEPEC-2007 were considered moderately tolerant and clones CEPEC-2008 and PS-1319 were considered non-tolerant. Therefore, clones CCN-10 and CP-49 have the potential to be cultivated in hydromorphic soils or with drainage problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it