MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388145590 · doi:10.1109/mias.2023.3325095

Transformer DC Bias Detection: Using Differential Current Waveforms

2023· article· en· W4388145590 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Industry Applications Magazine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDC biasCurrent transformerLinear variable differential transformerDelta-wye transformerTransformerEnergy efficient transformerWaveformDistribution transformerControl theory (sociology)Transformer effectFlyback transformerDifferential protectionRotary variable differential transformerElectronic engineeringIsolation transformerEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article proposes a dc bias detection method for power transformers that utilizes the three-phase differential current waveforms available in transformer differential relays. It is shown that the dc bias condition can be detected from the asymmetry of the differential current waveforms, occurring due to the transformer core saturation caused by the dc bias. It is also shown that the proposed method can identify the dc bias with and without the current transformer (CT) saturation. Furthermore, time domain simulations verify the method’s effectiveness in detecting dc bias for different transformer types and winding connections. Additionally, it is revealed that the proposed method can discriminate between the dc bias and transformer energization conditions with different transformer switching angles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it