MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388145604 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2023.3328918

Energy Sustainability in Dense Radio Access Networks via High Altitude Platform Stations

2023· article· en· W4388145604 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Mehrabian, Halim Yanikomeroglus

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBase stationEfficient energy useComputer networkEnergy consumptionQuality of serviceScalabilityRadio access networkHeterogeneous networkWireless networkWirelessTelecommunicationsMobile stationEngineeringDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing demand for radio access networks (RANs) driven by advanced wireless technology and the ever-increasing mobile traffic, faces significant energy consumption challenges that threaten sustainability. To address this, an architecture referring to the vertical heterogeneous network (vHetNet) has recently been proposed. Our study seeks to enhance network operations in terms of energy efficiency and sustainability by examining a vHetNet configuration, comprising a high altitude platform station (HAPS) acting as a super macro base station (SMBS), along with a macro base station (MBS) and a set of small base stations (SBSs) in a densely populated area. By intelligently managing SBSs’ sleep mode and employing HAPS’s potentials and additional capacity, our approach aims to minimize vHetNet energy consumption. The proposed method dynamically determines which SBSs to switch off based on the traffic load of SBSs, MBS, and HAPS. This innovative approach offers a flexible and promising solution to enhance network sustainability, energy efficiency, and capacity utilization without compromising the user quality-of-service (QoS). We show that our proposed method offers a scalable solution with comparable performance to exhaustive search (ES) as the optimal solution in terms of energy efficiency. Furthermore, incorporating HAPS, significantly improves grid power consumption, compared to having no offloading, reducing it by 30% for a large number of SBSs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Networking LettersSame topicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksFrench-language works237,207