MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388146155 · doi:10.15353/cjo.v84i3.1971

Diplopia as the presenting symptom in giant cell arteritis

2022· article· en· W4388146155 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cari L. Nealon, Rachael L. Canania

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiplopiaMedicineEtiologyPresentation (obstetrics)Giant cell arteritisDermatologyAbducens nerveDifferential diagnosisSurgeryPediatricsVasculitisPathologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acquired cranial nerve palsies commonly present to primary eye care clinics and are associated with a variety of etiologies. While microvascular ischemia is the most common association in adults over age fifty, cranial nerve palsies can be associated with other more insidious etiologies, like giant cell arteritis (GCA). There are traditional clinical guidelines for additional diagnostic testing in acute cranial nerve palsies to help identity the other non-microvascular causes, but the guidelines do not specifically address GCA. Although rare, clinicians need to be aware that diplopia can be associated with GCA and use systemic symptoms like jaw claudication and neck pain to screen all acute cranial nerve palsies in adults over age fifty. This case report highlights an uncommon presentation of GCA, emphasizes the importance of broadening a diplopia differential diagnosis list, and provides a brief GCA review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry→Same topicVasculitis and related conditions→French-language works237,207→