MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388163951 · doi:10.18814/epiiugs/2023/023023

Redefinition of the Global Stratotype Section and Point (GSSP) and new Standard Auxiliary Boundary Stratotype (SABS) for the base of Wuchiapingian Stage (Lopingian Series, Permian) in South China

2023· article· en· W4388163951 on OpenAlexaff
Shu‐zhong Shen, Dong‐xun Yuan, Yichun Zhang, M. Henderson Charles, Quan-feng Zheng, Hua Zhang, Min Zhang, Yu Dai, Hai-Peng Xu, Wen-qian Wang, Qian Li, Yue Wang, Xiangdong Wang, Lin Mu, Jahandar Ramezani, Douglas H. Erwin, Lucia Angiolini, Feifei Zhang, Zhang-shuai Hou, Jun Chen, Xi-Yang Zhang, Shuhan Zhang, Qiong Wu, Yongxin Pan, Michael H. Stephenson, Shi-long Mei

Bibliographic record

VenueEpisodes · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsGlobal Boundary Stratotype Section and PointZhàngStratotypePhilosophyPermianChinaStage (stratigraphy)HistoryGeologyPaleontologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shu-zhong Shen, Dong-xun Yuan, Yi-chun Zhang, Charles, M. Henderson, Quan-feng Zheng, Hua Zhang, Min Zhang, Yu Dai, Hai-peng Xu, Wen-qian Wang, Qian Li, Yue Wang, Xiang-dong Wang, Lin Mu, Jahandar Ramezani, Douglas H. Erwin, Lucia Angiolini, Fei-fei Zhang, Zhang-shuai Hou, Jun Chen, Xi-yang Zhang, Shu-han Zhang, Qiong Wu, Yong-xin Pan, Michael Stephenson, Shi-long Mei. Episodes -0001;0:. https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2023/023023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpisodesSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207