MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388169130 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21420

Adsorption of copper from water using TiO2-modified activated carbon derived from orange peels and date seeds: Response surface methodology optimization

2023· article· en· W4388169130 on OpenAlex
Roya Sadat Neisan, Noori M. Cata Saady, Carlos Bazán, Sohrab Zendehboudi, Talib M. Albayati

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNanoparticles: synthesis and applications
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsResponse surface methodologyAdsorptionActivated carbonOrange (colour)Central composite designCopperNuclear chemistryTitanium dioxideChemistryTitaniumSurface modificationContact angleMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyMetallurgyComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study evaluated the application and efficiency of modified activated carbon in the removal of copper (Cu) from synthetic aquatic samples. The surface of activated carbon derived from orange peel (AC-OP) and date seeds (AC-DS) have been modified by Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO 2 NPs) (1:10 wt% mixing ratio) and used in a series of experiments designed by Response Surface Methodology (RSM) incorporating Central Composite Design (CCD). The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) test demonstrated that the modification has increased the surface area of AC-OP from 2.40 to 6.06 m 2 g −1 and AC-DS from 51.10 to 81.37 m 2 g −1 . Effects of pH (1–7), ion initial concentration (10–60 mg L −1 ), adsorbent dose (0.5–8 g L −1 ), and contact time (0.4–6 h) have been investigated. The results showed that the optimum conditions for TiO 2 -modified AC-OP (OP–TiO 2 ) are pH 5, initial concentration of 24.6 mg L −1 , adsorbent dose of 4.9 g L −1 , and contact time of 3.6 h. The optimum conditions for TiO 2 -modified AC-DS (DS-TiO 2 ) are pH 6.4, initial concentration of 21.2 mg L −1 , adsorbent dose of 5 g L −1 , and contact time of 3.0 h. The modified quadratic models represented the results well with regression coefficients of 0.91 and 0.99 for OP-TiO 2 and DS-TiO 2 , respectively. The maximum Cu removal for OP-TiO 2 and DS-TiO 2 were 99.90 % and 97.40 %, and the maximum adsorption capacity was found to be 13.34 and 13.96 mg g −1 , respectively. Kinetic data have been fitted to pseudo first-order, pseudo second-order, intra-particle diffusion, and Elovich models. The pseudo second-order showed a better fit to the experimental data (R 2 > 98 %). This study demonstrates the successful development of modified activated carbon derived from orange peels and date seeds, modified by TiO 2 nanoparticles, for efficient adsorption of copper ions from water. The findings contribute to understanding the adsorption mechanism and provide valuable insights for designing environmentally friendly adsorbents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it