MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388180848 · doi:10.37885/978-65-5360-455-1

Comunicação e Inovação: impactos, experiências e contribuições em pesquisa

2023· book· pt· W4388180848 on OpenAlexaff
Ernane Rosa Martins

Bibliographic record

VenueEditora Científica Digital eBooks · 2023
Typebook
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Digital Technologies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyethism is important because it allows worker honeybees to perform a variety of tasks that are important to the colony's survival. The honeybee's brain and glands are essential to the development of these tasks. In this study, we investigate the total protein amount of four major glands and the brain during the first 30 d of adult life between Africanized and European honeybees (Apis mellifera). The brain, hypopharyngeal, mandibular, cephalic, and thoracic salivary glands of adults workers from newborn to 30 d of age (at intervals of 5 d per sampling age) were dissected and the total protein amount was measured in a pool of 10 structures per age/repetition (with three repetitions) using the Bradford protein assay. The heads of the honeybee subspecies were also measured. We confirmed the significantly smaller head size of Africanized honeybees compared to European honeybees, which probably impacted the reduced amount of total protein in hypopharyngeal and cephalic salivary glands in this honeybee. The brain protein amount, however, remained similar between the two subspecies. Despite that, the mandibular and thoracic salivary glands in Africanized honeybees showed more total protein amount. Finally, we find that Africanized and European honeybees showed some difference in total protein amount peak pattern, which may be due to differences in the life span, genetics, and/or environment that those honeybees live in.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.009
Scholarly communication0.0150.010
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEditora Científica Digital eBooks→Same topicEducation and Digital Technologies→French-language works237,207→