MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388181106 · doi:10.1093/jas/skad341.336

PSIII-16 Body Calcium and Phosphorus Mobilization of Sows During Lactation

2023· article· en· W4388181106 on OpenAlexaff
J. Heurtault, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, P. Schlegel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactationWeaningAnimal scienceLean body massCalciumChemistryPhosphorusParity (physics)Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryBone mineralEndocrinologyInternal medicineMedicineBody weightPregnancyBiologyOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Considering the excess of phosphorus (P) as a fertilizer in some regions, optimizing its use by animals is crucial to reduce its excretion. During the production cycle of the sow, P and calcium (Ca) requirement are greatest in lactation. To satisfy P and Ca need for milk production, sows have Ca and P available from dietary intake, but may also mobilize Ca and P from bone reserves. If that is the case, considering bone mobilization during lactation would be an opportunity to reduce dietary P intake. However, to our knowledge, bone mobilization in lactating sows is not well documented because of the difficulty in measuring it. With the use of X-ray technology to determine body composition on live animals, this subject can now be studied. Thus, the objective of this experiment was to quantify the body mineral mobilization during lactation for sows up to 3rd parity using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, i-DXA, GE Medical Systems, Glattbrugg, Switzerland) to obtain whole body bone mineral content (BMC) and whole-body lean and fat tissue mass. Eighteen Swiss Large White sows were scanned on day 2 and 26 (weaning) after parturition. The lactation diet was formulated to meet nutritional requirements; parity 1 [digestible energy (DE): 12.1 MJ, digestible P (DigP): 3.0 g, Ca: 9.0 g /kg], parity 2 and 3 (DE: 14.1 MJ, DigP: 2.8 g, Ca: 8.0 g /kg). Whole body P and Ca contents were calculated from lean tissue mass and BMC obtained by DXA. Bone mineral mobilization (BMCMOB, g), body phosphorus mobilization (PMOB, g) and body calcium mobilization (CaMOB, g) were calculated as the difference in BMC, body P and body Ca between day 26 and day 2. Piglets were weighed at farrowing and weaning and the average daily gain per piglet (PigletADG, kg/d) and the birth weight of litter (LitterBW, kg) were calculated. The mean body composition was on day 2: BMC, 5,810 ± 1082 g; P, 1,344 ± 207 g; Ca, 2,362 ± 440 g and on day 26: BMC, 5,093 ± 1,001 g; P, 1,228 ± 198 g; Ca: 2,070 ± 407 g. The pigletADG was 0.24 ± 0.05 kg/d and LitterBW was 18.5 ± 2.47 kg. The prediction equations for BMCMOB and body Ca and P during lactation are presented in Table 1. The best predictor was PigletADG and for body P, LitterBW also tended to be an influencing factor. This study allowed to quantify the P and Ca mobilization of the sow during lactation. Next step will be to evaluate the impact of dietary supply on this mobilization to then integrate it in requirement models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207