Enhanced Ship/Iceberg Classification in SAR Images Using Feature Extraction and the Fusion of Machine Learning Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drifting icebergs present significant navigational and operational risks in remote offshore regions, particularly along the East Coast of Canada. In such areas with harsh weather conditions, traditional methods of monitoring and assessing iceberg-related hazards, such as aerial reconnaissance and shore-based support, are often unfeasible. As a result, satellite-based monitoring using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery emerges as a practical solution for timely and remote iceberg classifications. We utilize the C-CORE/Statoil dataset, a labeled dataset containing both ship and iceberg instances. This dataset is derived from dual-polarized Sentinel-1. Our methodology combines state-of-the-art deep learning techniques with comprehensive feature selection. These features are coupled with machine learning algorithms (neural network, LightGBM, and CatBoost) to achieve accurate and efficient classification results. By utilizing quantitative features, we capture subtle patterns that enhance the model’s discriminative capabilities. Through extensive experiments on the provided dataset, our approach achieves a remarkable accuracy of 95.4% and a log loss of 0.11 in distinguishing icebergs from ships in SAR images. The introduction of additional ship images from another dataset can further enhance both accuracy and log loss results to 96.1% and 0.09, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".