MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388187440 · doi:10.32721/ctj.2023.71.3.fon

Finances of the Nation: From Bonds to Banknotes—Central Banking and Public Finances in Canada

2023· article· en· W4388187440 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Trevor Tombe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPosition (finance)Balance sheetDebtEconomicsGovernment (linguistics)BondQuantitative easingRevenuePoliticsMonetary policyEconomic policyFinancial systemFinanceBusinessCentral bankPolitical scienceMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a summary of the Bank of Canada's finances from 1935 to the present, highlighting the interplay between the central bank and the federal government's fiscal operations. It explores the historical, political, and economic factors that led to the establishment and subsequent nationalization of the Bank of Canada. It also presents new data and analysis on the central bank's impact on Canadian public finances. By examining the evolution of the Bank of Canada's balance sheet, revenue streams, and expenditures, the article underscores the importance of understanding these connections, particularly considering the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent implementation of quantitative easing. Understanding the financial position of the Bank of Canada separately from the broader consolidated position of the government of Canada is valuable. For example, it allows one to construct a broader measure of federal debt service costs, which today are materially larger than what is reported in the public accounts. It may also clarify the implications of monetary policy choices for the economic and financial welfare of the nation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienneSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207