A Convolutional Neural Network for Beamforming and Image Reconstruction in Passive Cavitation Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), initially developed for image processing applications, have recently received significant attention within the field of medical ultrasound imaging. In this study, passive cavitation imaging/mapping (PCI/PAM), which is used to map cavitation sources based on the correlation of signals across an array of receivers, is evaluated. Traditional reconstruction techniques in PCI, such as delay-and-sum, yield high spatial resolution at the cost of a substantial computational time. This results from the resource-intensive process of determining sensor weights for individual pixels in these methodologies. Consequently, the use of conventional algorithms for image reconstruction does not meet the speed requirements that are essential for real-time monitoring. Here, we show that a three-dimensional (3D) convolutional network can learn the image reconstruction algorithm for a 16×16 element matrix probe with a receive frequency ranging from 256 kHz up to 1.0 MHz. The network was trained and evaluated using simulated data representing point sources, resulting in the successful reconstruction of volumetric images with high sensitivity, especially for single isolated sources (100% in the test set). As the number of simultaneous sources increased, the network's ability to detect weaker intensity sources diminished, although it always correctly identified the main lobe. Notably, however, network inference was remarkably fast, completing the task in approximately 178 s for a dataset comprising 650 frames of 413 volume images with signal duration of 20μs. This processing speed is roughly thirty times faster than a parallelized implementation of the traditional time exposure acoustics algorithm on the same GPU device. This would open a new door for PCI application in the real-time monitoring of ultrasound ablation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".