MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The modeled seasonal cycles of land biosphere and ocean N2O fluxes and atmospheric N2O

2023· preprint· en· W4388187968 on OpenAlexaff
Qing Sun, Fortunat Joos, Sebastian Lienert, Sarah Berthet, Dustin Carroll, Cheng Gong, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Sian Kou‐Giesbrecht, Angela Landolfi, Manfredi Manizza, Naiqing Pan, Michael J. Prather, Pierre Regnier, Laure Resplandy, Roland Séférian, Hao Shi, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Rona L. Thompson, Hanqin Tian, Nicolas Vuichard, Sönke Zaehle, Qing Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaDalhousie University
FundersEuropean CommissionEnvironmental Restoration and Conservation AgencyU.S. Department of EnergySchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTroposphereEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSeasonalityStratosphereNorthern HemisphereGreenhouse gasClimatologyFlux (metallurgy)BiosphereSouthern HemisphereOceanographyGeologyChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas and an ozone-depleting agent with large and growing anthropogenic emissions. Previous studies identified the influx of N2O-depleted air from the stratosphere to partly cause the seasonality in tropospheric N2O (aN2O), but other contributions remain unclear. Here we combine surface fluxes from eight land and four ocean models from phase 2 of the Nitrogen/N2O Model Intercomparison Project with tropospheric transport modeling to simulate aN2O at the air sampling sites: Alert, Barrow, Ragged Point, Samoa, Ascension Island, and Cape Grim for the modern and preindustrial periods. Models show general agreement on the seasonal phasing of zonal-average N2O fluxes for most sites, but, seasonal peak-to-peak amplitudes differ severalfold across models. After transport, the seasonal amplitude of surface aN2O ranges from 0.25 to 0.80 ppb (interquartile ranges 21-52% of median) for land, 0.14 to 0.25 ppb (19-42%) for ocean, and 0.13 to 0.76 ppb (26-52%) for combined flux contributions. The observed range is 0.53 to 1.08 ppb. The stratospheric contributions to aN2O, inferred by the difference between surface-troposphere model and observations, show 36-126% larger amplitudes and minima delayed by ~1 month compared to Northern Hemisphere site observations. Our results demonstrate an increasing importance of land fluxes for aN2O seasonality, with land fluxes and their seasonal amplitude increasing since the preindustrial era and are projected to grow under anthropogenic activities. In situ aN2O observations and atmospheric transport-chemistry models will provide opportunities for constraining terrestrial and oceanic biosphere models, critical for projecting surface N2O sources under ongoing global warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→