MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Small airways obstruction is present in Covid-19 pneumonia’s acute period.

2023· article· en· W4388188689 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Immanuels Taivāns, Gunta Strazda, Normunds Jurka, Valentina Gordjushina

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineSmall airwaysConfidence intervalCardiologyDiseaseLung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The role of small airways in the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 induced lung disease has not been sufficiently studied. Especially it concerns the acute period of disease. The aim of our study was to find out whether small airways obstruction occurs in acute period of covid-19 infection and whether obstruction resolves within three months. We selected 18 oxygen dependent patients treated in the hospital for moderate severity covid-19 pneumonia who arrived for control three months after the discharge. Small airways patency was measured by forced oscillation technique (FOT) using portable instrument Tremoflo C-100, Thorasys, Canada. Indices characterizing small airways resistance and reactance are present in the table. During the acute period the upper limit of normal (ULN) for resistance and reactance indices was exceeded in 11 of 18 patients, but after 3 months – only in 4 to 5 of 18. M & CI – mean and confidence interval; ULN – upper limit of normal We conclude that small airways become obstructed during acute period of covid-19 pneumonia. This condition resolves in 3 months in majority of patients, however one third of patients still have signs of small airways disease after 3 months recovery period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→