MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388193810 · doi:10.1016/j.jweia.2023.105581

An investigation of rain-wind induced vibrations on stay cables in a novel range of operating conditions

2023· article· en· W4388193810 on OpenAlexaffabout
Annick D’Auteuil, Sean McTavish, Arash Raeesi, Guy L. Larose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsRowan Williams Davies & Irwin (Canada)National Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)VibrationEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAcousticsStructural engineeringMarine engineeringGeologyEngineeringAerospace engineeringGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large-scale rain-wind induced vibration (RWIV) dynamic test rig at the National Research Council Canada (NRC) was used in the current work to evaluate the vibration characteristics of a 0.218 m diameter smooth stay cable, for two cable inclinations and a wide range of yaw-angle conditions. The structural damping ratio was in the range of 0.05% to 0.11% and the heave frequency was approximately 1.23 Hz for a cable with a moving mass of 217 kg. The presence of RWIV was investigated at an inclination angle of 30° from the horizontal over a yaw-angle range of 25° to 45° and for an inclination angle of 55° over a yaw-angle range of −40° to +45°. An upper rivulet was present when vibrations were observed. For positive yaw angles, the upper rivulet was characterized by a thin line of water, approximately 5 to 10 mm wide, running along the entire length of the inclined cable on the windward side and moving along the cable span with a serpentine motion. For negative yaw angles, the upper rivulet was located near top of the cable or on the leeward sector of the cable, was wider than the rivulets observed for positive yaw angles, and was not observed to move in a serpentine motion. RWIVs were observed for each yaw angle that was investigated, including at negative yaw angles, with a maximum amplitude of motion of ±150 mm (∼0.7D). The direction of the rain impingement was an important factor affecting the formation and characteristics of the upper rivulet at the surface of the cable and, for the onset for vibrations. RWIVs were observed for wind speeds between 5 and 12 m/s. The Reynolds number corresponding to the onset of RWIV tended to increase with larger yaw angles in the positive yaw-angle range. At an inclination angle of 30°, the onset of RWIV ranged from 1.2×105 at a yaw of 25° to 1.4×105 at a yaw of 45° while at a cable inclination angle of 55°, the onset of RWIV ranged from 1.08×105 at a yaw of 25° to 1.25×105 at a yaw of 40°. The onset of vibrations for a yaw angle of 0° was at 0.77×105 for a cable inclination of 55°. RWIV was initiated at lower Reynolds numbers at an inclination angle of 55° for negative yaw angles, with vibrations observed at wind speeds as low as 5 m/s (Reynolds number of 0.7×105). The results confirmed the presence of RWIV in well-understood conditions and have effectively expanded the range of conditions over which RWIV has been observed in a wind tunnel. The expanded range over which RWIV was observed includes vibrations at an inclination angle of 55°, vibrations at a yaw angle of 0°, and vibrations at negative yaw angles from −10° to −40°.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wind Engineering and Industrial AerodynamicsSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207